The True Story of 9/11

The True Story of 9/11 

Using the attacks of 2001-09-11 as a pretext for global conflict

— by Stanley Monteith, 2006 source: Radio Liberty

 

 

 

http://www.modernhistoryproject.org/mhp/ArticleDisplay.php?Article=TrueStory911

 

Table of Contents

1: Reality Control

The invisible government and the war on terrorism

2: The Best Enemy Money Can Buy

The power elite builds up the ‘Islamic threat’

3: A Catastrophic and Catalysing Event

Using the 9/11 attack to accelerate the push for world government

4: Surpise, Surprise

Denying the advance knowledge of the 9/11 attack plan

5: Conclusion

Foreknowledge, coverup, and the march of Empire

 

 

Chapter 1: Reality Control
The invisible government and the war on terrorism

Beating the War Drums

The Bush administration claims Iran will be able to produce nuclear weapons within a few months, and we cannot let that happen. [And yet,] the CIA doesn’t agree with that view; they claim Iran won’t be able to build nuclear weapons for 5-10 years. Which assessment is correct? [We] will address that subject, and the growing threat of war.

A front-page article in the August 24, 2006, edition of The New York Times states:

“Some senior Bush administration officials and top Republican lawmakers are voicing anger that American spy agencies have not issued more ominous warnings about the threats that they say Iran presents to the United States. Some policy makers have accused intelligence agencies of playing down Iran’s role in Hezbollah’s recent attacks against Israel and overestimating the time it would take for Iran to build a nuclear weapon. . . . They echo the tensions that divided the administration and the Central Intelligence Agency during the prelude to the war in Iraq.” [7]

Paul Craig Roberts, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury during the Reagan administration, wrote:

“Alarmed by the neoconservative drive to start a war with Iran before the U.S. can extricate itself from the Iraq catastrophe, the CIA firmly declared that any Iranian nuclear weapon is a decade away. This undermines the neoconservatives’ urgency to attack Iran now.

Neoconservative fanatics tried to discredit the CIA with a recent report by the House Intelligence Committee Republican staff written by neoconservative Frederick Fleitz, a protege of neocon heavyweight John Bolton, a person active in concocting the false case for war against Iraq. Fleitz alleges that the CIA is a ‘know-nothing’ agency that lacks the ability to assess Iran’s ability to make nuclear weapons.

Neocons also dismiss the findings of the International Atomic Energy Agency, which issued a report on August 31 reaffirming that there is no tangible proof that Iran’s nuclear energy program has a military aspect.” [8]

Despite the fact that a recent poll reveals 60% of the American people believe the U.S. attack on Iraq was a mistake, the Bush administration wants to attack Iran. Russia and China oppose the effort to impose UN sanctions on Iran because they trade with that country, but may agree to our request because they know the U.S. cannot defeat Iran militarily, and an extended conflict in the Middle East will destroy the financial stability of our nation.

Newt Gingrich is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). He helped establish the U.S. Commission on National Security / 21st Century that studied terrorism, and is associated with the Spiritual / New Age Hierarchy that directs the course of world events. [9] On July 15, 2006, the Seattle Times reported:

 

“Former U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich says America is in World War III and President Bush should say so. In an interview in Bellevue this morning Gingrich said Bush should call a joint session of Congress the first week of September and talk about global military conflicts in much starker terms than have been heard from the president.” [10]

 

On July 20, 2006, the UK Guardian published an article by Newt Gingrich that stated:

 

“The civilized world stands balanced between victory and defeat. The long road to victory begins with the free world helping the Lebanese democracy defeat Hizbullah, expelling the Iranian Revolutionary Guards and removing all of the 10,000 plus missiles aimed at Israel from Lebanon. . . . The nature of the threat – with Iran at the epicenter – is at its core ideological. . . . The events of just the last seven weeks throughout the world share the common strategic goal of defeating the West and its values. It could be accurately described as a third world war. . . . The free world must stand up to the barbarism or be defeated by it. . . . In this crisis of civilization, with nerve and steady focus it is possible to win a decisive victory.” [11]

I believe Newt Gingrich is on the right track. We may be on the verge of World War III. [But] who is the enemy?

The Invisible Government

President Bush claims we are “fighting terrorism,” some people claim we are fighting “radical Islam,” and others claim they “hate us because we are free.” All of those concepts are wrong. Edward Bernays developed the propaganda/mind-control techniques that are being used to get the American people to hate Moslems, and Moslems to hate the United States. He wrote:

 

“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of.” [12]

 

Edward Bernays referred to an invisible government. Does the U.S. have “an invisible government?” Yes. A small group of powerful men (and a few women) have controlled our nation for over 100 years. President Woodrow Wilson wrote about them in his book, “The New Freedom” (1913):

 

“Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.” [13]

James W. Gerard was the American Ambassador to Germany prior to World War I. He wrote about the covert movement in his book, “My First Eighty-three Years in America”:

 

“Shortly after our return to America the New York Times sent a reporter to ask me the names of the ‘rulers of America.’ Sitting in my office that afternoon, I gave the reporter a list. They amounted finally to fifty-two, and of course, as Ferdinand Lundberg says in his book “Sixty Families”, it was quite evident that I added some personal friends to the list. . . . Of course my list of ‘rulers’ referred to economic headship, but it was taken generally to mean the men who ruled America not only economically but politically.” [14]

John Hylan was the Mayor of New York in 1922. He wrote:

 

“The real menace of our republic is this invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy length over city, state and nation. Like the octopus of real life, it operates under cover of a self-created screen. It seizes in its long and power(ful) tentacles our executive officers, our legislative bodies, our schools, our courts, our newspapers, and every agency created for the public protection. . . let me say at the head of this octopus are the RockefellerStandard Oil interests and a small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as the international bankers. . . .

They practically control both political parties, write political platforms, make catspaws of party leaders, use the leading men in private organizations, and resort to every device to place in nomination for high public office only such candidates as will be amenable to the dictates of corrupt big business. . . . They use the columns of these papers to club into submission or drive out of office public officials who refuse to do the bidding of the powerful corrupt cliques which compose the invisible government.” [15]

Professor Carroll Quigley studied the movement and wrote about it in his book, “Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World In Our Time”:

 

“There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical Right believes the Communists act. . . . I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records. . . .” [16]

When I researched Colonel House‘s papers at Yale University, I found a copy of a letter that President Franklin Delano Roosevelt sent Colonel House on November 21, 1933, that contains the following statement:

 

“I had a nice talk with Jack Morgan the other day. . . . J.P.M. (J.P. Morgan Jr., ed) did not seem much troubled over the gold purchasing. . . . The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson. . . . The country is going through a repetition of Jackson’s fight with the Bank of the United States – – only on a far bigger and broader basis.” [17]

Who controls the U.S. government today? Members of David Rockefeller‘s Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the Bilderbergers (BB), the Trilateral Commission (TC), the Club of Rome (CR), leading Masons, occult groups, and the Spiritual Hierarchy that energizes the organizations. I call them the BOD or the “Brotherhood of Darkness.” They control both political parties, the presidency, the mass media, most major banks, most major corporations, and most of the wealth of the world. [18]

If that is true, why hasn’t someone told the American people? Because most journalists and most media pundits want to keep their jobs, and don’t want to end up like Gary Webb, a Pulitzer prize winning columnist who exposed the CIA‘s involvement in the drug trade, who shot himself in the head twice to make certain he was dead. Richard Harwood, the former editorial page editor of The Washington Post, tried to expose the CFR‘s control of our government in October 1993 when he wrote:

 

“The president is a member. So is his Secretary of State, the deputy Secretary of State, all five of the Undersecretaries, several of the Assistant Secretaries and the department’s legal adviser. The president’s National Security Advisor and his deputy are members. The director of Central Intelligence (like all previous directors) and the chairman of the Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board are members. The Secretary of Defense, three Undersecretaries and at least four Assistant Secretaries are members. The secretaries of the Departments of Housing and Urban Development, Interior, Health and Human Services and the chief White House public relations man, David Gergen, are members, along with the speaker of the House and the majority leader of the Senate.” [19]

 

In the past 15 years, council directors have included Hedley Donovan of Time Inc., Elizabeth Drew of the New Yorker, Philip Geyelin of The Washington Post, Karen Elliott House of the Wall Street Journal and Strobe Talbott of Time magazine, who is now President Clinton’s ambassador at large in the Slavic world.

The editorial page editor, deputy editorial page editor, executive editor, managing editor, foreign editor, national affairs editor, business and financial editor and various writers as well as Katherine Graham, the paper’s principal owner, represent The Washington Post in the council’s membership.

The executive editor, managing editor and foreign editor of the New York Times are members, along with executives of such other large newspapers as the Wall Street Journal and Los Angeles Times, the weekly news magazines, network television executives and celebrities – Dan Rather, Tom Brokaw and Jim Lehrer, for example – and various columnists, among them Charles Krauthammer, William Buckley, George Will and Jim Hoagland.” [20]

 

Professor Ben Bagdikian’s book, “The New Media Monopoly”, documents the fact that five mega corporations control 90% of the American media. The book is available from Radio Liberty. Lt. General William Odom headed the NSA, the intelligence organization that tracks our phone calls, our e-mails, our faxes, and our activities. The “Secrecy Agreement” he signed prevents him from revealing what is taking place, but his book, “Fixing Intelligence” (2003) asks:

 

“. . . should the CIA be permitted to carry out assassinations? Should Army Counter-intelligence be involved in domestic surveillance of civilians? Should CIA clandestine officers be allowed to have cover as journalists?” [21]

The 9/11 Coverup

All of those things are taking place today. What can we do? BOD members control most media outlets, the police, the military, the government, the religious establishment, and most of the wealth of the world, but they fear the public will learn the truth about the events that took place on 9/11 and have launched a massive media campaign to convince the public the “official version of 9/11” is correct. The September 11, 2006, issue of U.S. News and World Report published an article that laments:

 

“Even as conspiracy theories thrived abroad, they mostly fell on deaf ears in the first years after the attacks. But as the fifth anniversary nears, 9/11 Truth and its outlandish claims have become an online phenomenon – and are proving startlingly persuasive. In a July 2006 Scripps Howard poll, 16 percent of respondents said it was ‘very likely’ that Federal officials either assisted in the 9/11 attacks or allowed them to happen to justify war in the Middle East, while a further 20 percent said it was ‘somewhat likely.'” [22]

 

The September 8, 2006 edition of World Affairs Brief states:

 

“Current polls put the numbers as high as 39% of Americans believe the U.S. government was in some way complicit in the terror attack of 9/11. That’s a very high number, surpassed only by the percentage of people that disbelieve the official government version about the assassination of JFK – 69%.” [23]

 

Joel Skousen cited a recent article in the UK Daily Mail that states:

 

“The 9/11 terrorist attack on America which left almost 3,000 people dead was an ‘inside job,’ according to a group of leading academics. Around 75 top professors and leading scientists believe the attacks were puppeteered by war mongers in the White House to justify the invasion and the occupation of oil-rich Arab countries. The claims have caused outrage and anger in the U.S. which marks the fifth anniversary of the terrorist attacks on Monday. But leading scientists say the facts of their investigations cannot be ignored and say they have evidence that points to one of the biggest conspiracies ever perpetrated.” [24]

 

Millions of Americans saw the C-Span broadcast of the “American Scholars Symposium,” and learned about the 9/11 military exercises that simulated terrorist hijackings, and the fact that most of the fighter planes that were supposed to guard Washington, D.C., were participating in military exercises in Canada that morning. [25]

The U.S. News and World Report article continued:

 

“There are some divergent strands among the conspiracy theorists, but for most of them, the story has two major tenets: The World Trade Center towers and nearby Building 7, though struck by planes, were brought down by controlled demolitions, and the Pentagon was struck by a missile, not a plane.” [26]

 

Why did the author suggest Building 7 was struck by a plane? No plane struck Building 7, and no reinforced steel building has ever collapsed because of a fire. You can watch the professionally controlled collapse of Building 7 at: http://www.wtc7.net/videos.html, http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc7.html.

The Bush administration tried to block the effort to determine what happened because they claimed a lengthy investigation would “detract from the war on terrorism.” When that argument failed to dissuade the public, the BOD organized two investigations: “The Joint Intelligence Committee” and the “9/11 Commission.”

The Joint Intelligence Committee didn’t try to determine why Building 7 collapsed because both Senator Bob Graham and Congressman Porter Goss, the co-chairmen of the committee, are members of the CFR. In addition, the Bush administration censored the report. [27]

The 9/11 Commission didn’t determine why Building 7 collapsed because the Chairman, Thomas Kean, the vice-Chairman, Lee Hamilton, two members, Jamie Gorelick and John Lehman, and the Executive Director of the 9/11 Commission, Philip Zelikow, are members of the CFR. [28] Former Senator Max Cleland was a member, but when it became obvious he wouldn’t participate in the charade, he was replaced. Again, the Bush administration censored the report. [29] Since there are almost 300 million people living in the U.S., and there are only 4000 members of the CFR, do you honestly believe the CFR’s control of both investigations was an accident?

 

Notes

7. Mark Mazzetti, “Some in G.O.P. Say Iran Threat is Played Down”, The New York Times, August 24, 2006, p. A1.

8. Paul Craig Roberts, “Pentagon to Congress: Bush is Wrong”, Counterpunch, Sept 4, 2006, http://www.counterpunch.org

9. William F. Jasper, “Speaking for Whom?”, The New American, December 12, 1994.

10. David Postman, “Gingrich says it’s World War III”, The Seattle Times, July 15, 2006.

11. Newt Gingrich, “The third world war has begun”, The UK Guardian, July 20, 2006.

12. Edward Bernays, “Propaganda”, Horace Liveright, New York, 1928, pp. 9-10.

13. Woodrow Wilson, “The New Freedom”, Doubleday, Doran & Company, Inc, Garden City, New York, 1913, pp. 13-14.

14. James W. Gerard, “My First Eighty-three Years in America”, Doubleday & Company Inc., Garden City, New York, 1951, p. 320.

15. John Hylan, the New York Times, March 27, 1922. Research copy available from Radio Liberty.

16. Carroll Quigley, “Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World In Our Time”, The Macmillan Company, New York, 1966, p. 950.

17. Franklin Delano Roosevelt, letter to Colonel House, Sterling Library, Yale University, November 21, 1933. Copy available from Radio Liberty.

18. See ” Brotherhood of Darkness” by the author

19. Richard Harwood, “Ruling Class Journalists”, the Washington Post, October 30, 1993, p. A 21

20. Ibid.

21. William Odom, “Fixing Intelligence”, Yale University Press, 2003, front flap cover.

22. Will Sullivan, “Viewing 9/11 From a Grassy Knoll”, U.S. News & World Report, September 11, 2006, p. 39.

23. Joel Skousen, World Affairs Brief, Sept 8, 2006, p. 2.

24. Ibid.

25. http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2006/050806popular.htm

26. Will Sullivan, op. cit.

27. Robert Gaylon Ross, “Who’s Who of the Elite”, RIE, Spicewood, TX, CFR membership list.

28. Ibid.

29. Thomas Kean et al, “Without Precedent”, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 2006, pp. 130-131.

MHP hyperlink version for non-profit educational purposes only

 

Chapter 2: The Best Enemy Money Can Buy
The power elite builds up the ‘Islamic threat’

The Power Elite

Have the American people been told the truth about the events that took place on 9/11? Does a small group (several hundred people) control most media outlets, most banks, most corporations, both political parties, and the presidency of the United States? If that is true, why hasn’t someone told the American people?

[We] discussed the men and the organizations that control most of the wealth of our nation. Some people call them “The Invisible Government,” other people call them “The Occult Hierarchy,” I call them “The Brotherhood of Darkness (BOD).” How did they obtain their wealth and power? I believe they are energized by spiritual entities that bridge the gap between the visible world and the spiritual dimension. What is their goal? They want to establish world government, destroy Christianity, bring the Kingdom of God to earth, and enslave mankind. [3] Will they succeed? Everything is in place. The U.N. Secretary General is the world leader, the Security Council is his Cabinet, the General Assembly is a world parliament. They have a World Bank, a World Court, a world army ( NATO), and a world police force (Interpol). I believe we are witnessing the final act of the ancient effort to reestablish world government.

The Council on Foreign Relations, and the organizations they spawned, coordinate the current effort to unify the world. The following entry appears in the “History of the CFR” section of their web site:

“The most fruitful ground for new members turned out to be the so-called ‘in-and outers’ – businessmen, lawyers, and academics described by social scientists like C. Wright Mills as an influential ‘power elite.’ Two widely quoted critics of the Council, Laurence H. Shoup and William Minter, studied the curriculum vitae of 502 government officials in high positions from 1945 to 1972, and found that more than half of them were members of the Council on Foreign Relations.” [4]

CFR officials have controlled U.S. Foreign Policy since 1945, but the Trilateral Commission (TC), which was organized by David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski in 1973, controls the U.S. presidency. Senator Barry Goldwater‘s book, “With No Apologies”, reveals their goal. The TC:

“. . . is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States.” [5]

David Rockefeller, Zbigniew Brzezinski, and the powerful men they recruited, wanted to “seize control of the political government of the United States,” and the “commercial and banking interests” of the world. Did they succeed? They began by recruiting a relatively unknown peanut farmer named Jimmy Carter, inducted him into the Trilateral Commission, trained him, focused media attention on him, and got Jimmy Carter elected President of the United States in 1976. Patrick Wood discussed the TC’c influence in the Carter administration in a recent issue of The August Review:

“Out of the 54 original U.S. members of the Trilateral Commission, Jimmy Carter was fronted to win the presidential election in 1976. Once inaugurated, Carter brought no less than 18 fellow members of the Commission into top-level cabinet and government agencies.” [6]

When Ronald Reagan was campaigning for the presidency in 1980, a reporter asked Reagan for his opinion of the Trilateral Commission. Ronald Reagan replied:

“I don’t believe that the Trilateral Commission is a conspiratorial group, but I do think its interests are devoted to international banking, multinational corporations, and so forth. I don’t think that any Administration of the U.S. Government should have the top nineteen positions filled by people from any one group or organization representing one viewpoint. No, I would go in a different direction.” [7]

Several months later, during the 1980 National Republican Convention, Ronald Reagan promised a group of supporters he wouldn’t accept George Herbert Walker Bush as his running mate, [8] but three days later Ronald Reagan selected George Bush as his running mate despite the fact that Bush supported abortion, and was a member of [both] the Trilateral Commission and Board of Directors of the CFR before he ran for the presidency. [9]

President Reagan appointed 287 members of the CFR and the TC to key positions in his administration, orchestrated the largest corporate and social security tax increase in U.S. history (1986), massively increased federal spending, and almost tripled the national debt during the eight years of his presidency. [10] Why did that happen? Most people believe Ronald Reagan was a Christian because he consulted Christian leaders and mentioned God in his speeches, but Ronald Reagan also accepted an honorary 33rd degree of Masonry on February 11, 1988 [11] and looked to Astrology.

Nancy Reagan’s astrologer, Joan Quigley, claims President Reagan asked his wife, “What does Joan say?” after Nancy visited her, and Wikipedia quotes a passage from Joan Quigley’s book that states:

“Not since the days of the Roman emperors – and never in the history of the United States Presidency – has an astrologer played such a significant role in the nation’s affairs of State.” [12]

If that is true, why hasn’t someone told the American people? [13]

The TC and the CFR used their influence to obtain the presidency for George H. W. Bush (TC, CFR) in 1988; most key positions in his administration were filled with members of these organizations. [14]

Bill Clinton [also] belonged to both groups and attended several Bilderberger meetings. Richard Harwood’s October 30, 1993, Washington Post article reveals the CFR influence in the Clinton administration:

“The president is a member. So is his secretary of state, the deputy secretary of state, all five of the undersecretaries, several of the assistant secretaries and the department’s legal adviser. The President’s national security adviser and his deputy are members. The director of Central Intelligence (like all previous directors) and the chairman of the Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board are members. The secretary of defense, three undersecretaries and at least four assistant secretaries are members. The secretaries of the departments of housing and urban development, interior, health and human services and the chief White House public relations man, David Gergen, are members, along with the speaker of the House and the majority leader of the Senate.” [15]

Bill Clinton‘s Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott, Federal Reserve Board Chairman Alan Greenspan, Director of the CIA George Tenet, and at least eight other members of the Clinton administration were members of the “North American Group” of the Trilateral Commission. [16]

George W. Bush wasn’t a member of either group, but Vice President Dick Cheney, who runs the Bush administration, belongs to both organizations. Members of the TC are asked to resign from the organization when they accept public office, so Dick Cheney resigned and his wife took his place. Lynne Cheney is currently one of the 130 members of the North American Group of the Trilateral Commission. [17]

Nine of the ten men that George W. Bush selected to advise him on foreign policy issues in 1999 were members of the Council on Foreign Relations. The tenth man, Richard Armitage, is a member of the Trilateral Commission. Almost all the key positions in the current Bush administration are held by members of the CFR and the TC. [18]

[Both G.W. Bush and his father are members of the elite Skull and Bones Society and the Bohemian Club, which have extensive cross-membership in these other groups. — ed]

The Best Enemy Money Can Buy

Is the BOD responsible for the tragic events that took place on 9/11? I believe they created the Islamic movement that supposedly threatens the U.S. today. [19]

Henry Kissinger was a founding member of the TC, a long-time member of the Board of Directors of the CFR, and is a leader of the BOD today. His September 13, 2006, op-ed-page article in The Washington Post discusses the implications of the coming war:

“The debate sparked by the Iraq war over American rashness versus European escapism is dwarfed by what the world now faces . . . the common danger of a wider war merging into a war of civilizations against the background of a nuclear-armed Middle East. . . . We now know that we face the imperative of building a new world order or potential global catastrophe.” [20]

Henry Kissinger claims we have two choices: we either abandon national sovereignty and build a new world order or face a potential global catastrophe. Are there other alternatives? Yes! We can expose the BOD’s involvement in the 9/11 attack. Where do we begin?

To understand the events that are taking place today, you must understand what happened in 1953 when John Foster Dulles was Secretary of State, and his brother, Allen Dulles, was the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Both men were founding members of the CFR, both men wanted to end national sovereignty, and both men wanted to establish world government. [21]

Under their direction, the CIA deposed the democratically elected government of Iran and installed the Shah of Iran because John Foster Dulles and Allen Dulles claimed [that] the Shah’s government would be a bulwark against communism. [22] Twenty-six years later, in 1979, when Zbigniew Brzezinski (CFR,TC) was President Carter’s National Security Advisor, the CIA deposed the Shah and installed the radical Islamic regime that rules Iran today. [23]

Why did Zbigniew Brzezinski depose the Shah of Iran, who was our ally, and install a radical Islamic regime that was aligned with the Soviet Union, and was our enemy? Apologists claim Brzezinski made a mistake, but I don’t believe that’s true. I believe Brzezinski understood the long-term consequences of his disastrous policy and created the Islamic fundamentalist movement that supposedly threatens the U.S. today. Zbigniew Brzezinski discussed the problem in his book, “The Grand Chessboard”:

“A possible challenge to American primacy from Islamic fundamentalism could be part of the problem in this unstable region. . . . However, without political cohesion and in the absence of a single genuinely powerful Islamic state, a challenge from Islamic fundamentalism would lack a geopolitical core and would thus be more likely to express itself through diffuse violence.” [24]

Most Americans weren’t aware of the threat of the Islamic movement until 2001/09/11. Where did it come from? When did it begin? It originated in Afghanistan in 1977 when the CFR-TC-controlled CIA began funding the rebels who were trying to destabilize the communist government that controlled that country. By December 1979, the puppet regime was on the verge of collapse. The Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan to keep their agents in power, precipitated the Afghan war, and spawned the Islamic fundamentalist movement that supposedly threatens the U.S. today. [25]

Saudi Arabia, Pakastani Intelligence (the ISI), and the CIA immediately began recruiting warriors from Islamic countries, trained them how to use explosives, taught them terrorist tactics, distributed copies of the Koran, stressed the importance of Islamic Jihad, and spawned the Islamic fundamentalist movement. [26] To insure the success of the program, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) spent $51 million on Islamic textbooks that were used in Afghan schools to promote radical Islamic belief, and stress the importance of Jihad. If you find that difficult to believe, I suggest you obtain a copy of “Teaching ABCs and Jihad” that appeared in the April 1-7, 2002 issue of The Washington Post National Weekly Edition. [27]

Following the Afghan war, Zbigniew Brzezinski repeatedly denied he was responsible for the conflict, but ten years later, in 1998, Brzezinski admitted he precipitated the Soviet invasion to bankrupt the Soviet Union and end the Cold War. [28] I don’t believe that is true. I believe Zbigniew Brzezinski knew the conflict between communism and the West was staged because he acknowledged the fact that the West financed the Bolsheviks on page 135 of his book, “Between Two Ages”. I also believe Brzezinski knew the U.S. financed the Soviet Union that provided most of the weapons that were used to kill American soldiers during the Vietnam war. If that is true, why did Brzezinski promote Islamic fundamentalism?

I believe the current conflict in the Middle East, and the disastrous war that lies ahead, were planned many years ago. If you find that view difficult to believe, I suggest you read ” Brotherhood of Darkness“, check my documentation, watch my interview with Professor Sutton, “The Best Enemies Money Can Buy”, read Professor Suttons’s books, and obtain a copy of the “Aid and Trade Documents” that Congressman Larry McDonald published before he disappeared into the living hell of the Soviet Gulag. [29]

Robert Dreyfuss’s book, “Devil’s Game”, traces the history of Islamic fundamentalism from its inception in 1869 to the advent of the Islamic terrorist movement that Zbigniew Brzezinski (TC, CFR) spawned during and after the Afghan war. Robert Dreyfuss quoted Fawaz Gerges who wrote:

“Containing Soviet Communism, said Brzezinski, dictated an avoidance of anything that might split Islamic opposition to the Soviets, especially a U.S.-Iranian military confrontation. ‘It now seemed to me more important to forge an anti-Soviet Islamic coalition’. As in the 1950s and 1960s, the United States hoped to use Islam against radical, secular forces and their atheist ally, the Soviet Union. Carter administration officials now recognized the new possibilities for cooperation with Islamic resurgence and hoped to harness its ideological and material resources against Communist expansionism.” [30]

Zbigniew Brzezinski admitted he created the radical movement when he was interviewed by Nouvel Observateur in 1998 and that his intention all along was to provoke a Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. When asked if he regretted supporting the rise of Islamic fundamentalism, he replied:

“What is more important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Muslims or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?” [31]

In the Introduction to “Devil’s Game”, Dreyfuss states:

“After 2001, the Bush administration appeared to sign on to the neoconservative declaration that the world was defined by a ‘clash of civilizations,’ and launched its global war on terrorism, targeting Al Qaeda – the most virulent strain of the very virus that the United States had helped create.” [32]

Did the CFR – TC create the Islamic terrorist movement?

Laying the Groundwork

The November-December 1994 issue of The World Future Society (WFS) magazine, The Futurist, published an article titled “The Future Face of Terrorism” that stated:

“The next 15 years may well be the age of superterrorism, when they gain access to weapons of mass destruction and show a new willingness to use them. . . . Terrorists in the early years of the twenty-first century will reflect the causes that excite passion and move people to violence . . . conflict will increase until a new stasis or ‘world order’ is established.” [33]

How did the WFS authors know what lay ahead? Robert S. McNamara is a lifetime trustee of the Trilateral Commission, a member of the Board of Directors of the WFS, and, at that time, the WFS’s logo was a circle that contained three sixes – 666.

Most people are distressed by the long lines they face at airports, and the fact that government agencies are monitoring phone calls under the guise of “fighting terrorism.” Did the BOD plan those things? Richard N. Haass was “director of national security programs” for the Council on Foreign Relations on August 4, 1996, when The Palm Beach Post, and several other newspapers published his article, “Land Of The Free Makes a Tempting Target”. Five years before 9/11, Richard Haass wrote:

“The war against terrorism is a war with an unlimited number of battles, none of them decisive. . . . What price are we prepared to pay? The price will be financial and personal. People will have to accept longer lines before entering buildings, longer delays at airports, more intrusive searches of belongings and our persons, and higher ticket prices to pay for all of this. . . . Greater vigilance will also involve a willingness to compromise some of our civil liberties, including accepting more frequent phone taps and surveillance . . . . Those who would resist paying such a price should keep in mind that terrorism could well get worse in the coming years . . . there is evidence that the terrorist challenge is entering a new phase.” [34]

Richard Haass was the “Director of Policy Planning” at the Department of State on 9/11/2001. He is currently President of the CFR and a member of the TC. There are 300 million people in the U.S. Why are almost all of the important posts in industry, banking, academia, the military, and government held by members of the CFR and the North American Group of the Trilateral Commission?

Zbigniew Brzezinski (CFR, TC) contends [that] the Middle East is the center of the world, and the U.S. must dominate that region to control the world. He wrote:

“As America becomes an increasingly multicultural society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstances of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat. Such a consensus generally existed throughout World War II and even during the Cold War. It was rooted . . . in a cultural and ethnic affinity for the predominantly European victims of hostile totalitarianisms. In the absence of a comparable external challenge, American society may find it much more difficult to reach agreement regarding foreign policies. . . .” (italics added) [35]

Members of the CFR and the TC who are also members of the Project For the New American Century understand [that] the U.S. must have an enemy, or at least a “widely perceived direct external threat” to justify U.S. control of the world. The authors of their publication, “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” (2000) expressed that concept when they wrote:

“The process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor.” (italics added) [36]

Thomas Kean (CFR), the Chairman of the 9/11 Commission, and Lee Hamilton (CFR,TC), the Vice Chairman of the 9/11 Commission, wrote a book titled “Without Precedent” that described Condoleezza Rice‘s (CFR) testimony before the 9/11 Commission. When she was asked “why more had not been done to take defensive measures in response to the threat reporting over the spring and summer,” she told the Commission the public wasn’t prepared to support President Bush‘s effort to take drastic action against Al Qaeda. There had to be a catastrophic event that forced people to think differently. Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton wrote:

“. . . Rice pointed out that the nation simply wasn’t prepared to take dramatic action against al Qaeda before 9/11 – either abroad or in reforming government at home – and said, ‘Until there is a catastrophic event that forces people to think differently, that forces people to overcome all customs and old culture and old fears about domestic intelligence . . . you don’t get that kind of change.'” (italics added) [37]

The 9/11 attack overcame “all customs and old culture and old fears about intelligence” of the American people, and generated public support for the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq.

When Donald Rumsfeld testified before the 9/11 Commission, he assured the commissioners that the Bush administration was working on a plan to defeat al Qaeda; the plan was completed on September 10, 2001, the day before the 9/11 attack. Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton wrote:

“Rumsfeld acknowledged the spike in reports of possible al Qaeda attacks in the spring and summer of 2001, saying, ‘There was a good deal of concern. It was certainly not business an usual.’ In response, he said the Bush administration was putting together a more ‘comprehensive policy’ to go after al Qaeda than the Clinton administration’s, a process that did not conclude until September 10, 2001.” [38]

Donald Rumsfeld claims the Bush administration’s plan was completed the day before the 9/11 attack. Twenty-six days later the U.S. deployed military forces in Afghanistan, but failed to capture Osama bin Laden and destroy al Qaeda and the Taliban.

H.L. Mencken wrote:

“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” [39]

[snip]

 

Notes

3. Stanley Monteith, “The Occult Hierarchy: Part II,” Radio Liberty letter, June 2005.

4. “Continuing the Inquiry”, Council on Foreign Relations

5. Barry Goldwater, “With No Apologies”, William Morrow and Company, Inc., New York, 1979, p. 280

6. Patrick Wood, “The Global Elite: Who are they?”, The August Review, September 26, 2006, p. 3

7. Demopedia: Trilateral Commission

8. Personal communication with Colonel Sleeper. See also: http://www.hooverdigest.org/004/allen.html

9. Trilateral Commission FAQ

10. Demopedia, op. cit.

11. Masonic Info, p. 13. See Also: Radio Liberty newsletter, Jan 2004, p.8.

12. wikipedia.org/wiki/Joan_Quigley

13. Richard Harwood, “Ruling Class Journalists,” The Washington Post, October 30, 1993: p. A21, Members of the TC and CFR control most media outlets in U.S., and censor the news.

14. David Rivera, “Final Warning

15. Ibid.

16. Ibid., See Also: Richard Harwood, op. cit.

17. http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/Trilateral_Members.htm

18. The New American, July 17, 2000

19. Norm Dixon, “How the CIA Created Osama bin Laden“, Conspiracy Archive

20. Henry Kissinger, “After Lebanon,” The San Diego Union Tribune, September 10, 2006

21. http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/cfrall2.htm

22. Carroll Quigley, “Tragedy and Hope: A History Of The World In Our Time”, The Macmillan Company, New York, 1966, pp. 1059-60.

23. Ernst Schroeder, “What Really Happened to the Shah of Iran

24. Zbigniew Brzezinski, “The Grand Chessboard”, Basic Books, 1997, pp. 53-4.

25. Norm Dixon, op. cit.

26. Ibid.

27. Joe Stephens et al, “Teaching ABCs and Jihad,” The Washington Post National Weekly Edition, April 1-7, 2002, p. 14.

28. John Cooley, “Unholy Wars”, Pluto Press, Virginia, 1999, p. 19.

29. Available from Radio Liberty, 800-544-8927

30. Robert Dreyfuss, “Devil’s Game”, Metropolitan Books, Henry Holt and Company, New York, 2005, p. 256.

31. Ibid., p. 265.

32. Ibid., p. 5.

33. Marvin Cetron et al, “The Future Face of Terrorism”, The Futurist, November-December, 1994, p. 10 and 15.

34. Richard Haass, “‘Land Of The Free’ Makes a Tempting Target”, The Palm Beach Post, August 4, 1996. Credit to Dr. Dennis Cuddy.

35. Zbigniew Brzezinski, op. cit.

36. “Rebuilding America’s Defenses”, p. 51, http://www.newamericancentury.org

37. Thomas Kean et al, Without Precedent, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 2006, p. 180.

38. Ibid., p. 161.

39. H.L. Mencken, quoted in “The Patriot Post”, July 26, 2006.

MHP hyperlink version for non-profit educational purposes only

 

Chapter 3: A Catastrophic and Catalysing Event
Using the 9/11 attack to accelerate the push for world government

Regional Trading Blocs

[We] discussed the men and the organizations that control our nation, and their effort to unite the world. President George W. Bush referred to the ancient Plan during the closing segment of his second Inaugural Address when he stated:

“When our Founders declared a new order of the ages . . . they were acting on an ancient hope that is meant to be fulfilled. History has an ebb and flow of justice, but history also has a visible direction, set by liberty and the Author of Liberty.” [6]

What is the “new order of the ages?” Who is the “Author of Liberty”? How are they related to the 9/11 attack?

The CFR, TC, Bilderbergers, Masons, Bohemian Grove, Skull and Bones, Lucis Trust, New Group of World Servers, Club of Rome, Royal Institute for International Affairs, Order of the Garter, and their ancillary organizations in Europe have concealed the Plan from public scrutiny because they realize most people don’t want to relinquish their freedom.

The Internationalists began their drive for hegemony by convincing the European people they would benefit from “free trade.” They organized the European Union (EU), formed the European Parliament, created the European currency (EURO), organized the European Bank, wrote the European Constitution, and established the faceless bureaucracy that rules Europe today. [7] Similar programs are being implemented in other regions of the world. The leaders of the ASEAN and APEC nations have agreed to organize a “trading bloc” in Southeast Asia. Hugo Chavez [of Venezuela] is trying to form several “free trade zones” in South America, a group of black leaders are trying to establish a “free trade zone” in Africa, and the Bush administration wants to establish a free trade zone in North America. [8]

President George W. Bush, President Vicente Fox [of Mexico], and Prime Minister Paul Martin [of Canada] attended a CFR Task Force meeting that was held in Waco, Texas, on March 23, 2005, and “committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action.” Two months later, in May 2005, the CFR published a book titled “Building a North American Community,” which summarized the “detailed and ambitious set of proposals” that the Bush administration agreed to implement at the Waco meeting. The Introduction to the CFR Task Force Report states:

 

“At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action.” [9]

Richard Haass, [chairman of the CFR], wrote the Foreword to the publication:

 

“This report examines these and other changes that have taken place since NAFTA‘s inception and makes recommendations to address the range of issues confronting North American policymakers today. . . . The Task Force offers a detailed and ambitious set of proposals that build on the recommendations adopted by the three governments at the Texas summit of March 2005. The Task Force’s central recommendation is establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community, the boundaries of which would be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter. Unlike previous Council-sponsored Task Forces, this project was international, or tri-national to be precise.” [10]

Have you read about the “recommendations adopted by the three governments at the Texas summit in March 2005,” or heard them discussed on the nightly news? Lou Dobbs is the only TV commentator who has discussed the BOD’s effort to unite the Northern Hemisphere, but he hasn’t mentioned the spiritual force that energizes the program. [11] The Internationalists want to merge the U.S. economy with the economy of our neighbors, merge our Social Security programs, merge law enforcement, promote migration, establish a “North American economic and security community,” and end the sovereignty of our nation. [12]

When President Bush returned from the Waco Summit meeting, he established the ” Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP)”, and began organizing the massive bureaucracy that will rule the Northern hemisphere.

You can confirm this information by:

What does the future hold? Countries will be forced to join a regional trading bloc and relinquish their national sovereignty. When that happens, the BOD will unite the trading blocs, and establish the “New Order of the Ages” that President Bush referred to during the closing segment of his Second Inaugural Address. [13]

What does that have to do with the 9/11 attack?

A “Catastrophic and Catalysing Event”

The BOD fears [that] the American people will discover what is taking place, and try to maintain their freedom. To prevent that from happening, the BOD needed a dramatic incident that would divert public attention from their effort to unite North America and to create public support for legislation that could be used to silence dissent. When President Bush addressed the U.N. General Assembly on November 20, 2001, he stated:

 

“We must speak the truth about terror. Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th. . . .” [14]

Why did President Bush mention “outrageous conspiracy theories?” Was he trying to intimidate people who want to know what happened on 9/11? What is a “conspiracy theory?” If you access the U.S. State Department web site, you will find a section titled, “How to Identify Misinformation” which states:

 

“How can a journalist or a news consumer tell if a story is true or false? There are no exact rules, but the following clues can help indicate if a story or allegation is true.

  • Does the story fit the pattern of a conspiracy theory?
  • Does the story fit the pattern of an ‘urban legend?’
  • Does the story contain a shocking revelation about a highly controversial issue?
  • Is the source trustworthy?
  • What does further research tell you?

Does the story claim that vast, powerful, evil forces are secretly manipulating events? If so, this fits the profile of a conspiracy theory. Conspiracy theories are rarely true, even though they have great appeal and are often widely believed. In reality, events usually have much less exciting explanations.” [15]

I suggest you reread [the previous chapters] because they discuss the “vast, powerful, evil forces” that created the Islamic movement and planned most of the events that are taking place today.

Richard Haass worked for the CFR. He revealed what lay ahead in an article that was published in The Palm Beach Post on August 4, 1996:

 

“The war against terrorism is a war with an unlimited number of battles, none of them decisive. . . . People will have to accept longer lines before entering buildings, longer delays at airports, more intrusive searches of belongings and our persons, and higher ticket prices to pay for all of this. . . . Greater vigilance will also involve a willingness to compromise some of our civil liberties, including accepting more frequent phone taps and surveillance.” [16]

Note the reference to “longer lines before entering buildings, longer delays at airports . . . a willingness to compromise some of our civil liberties, including more frequent phone taps and surveillance.” Almost everything Richard Haass predicted has come to pass. He was promoted for his fine work. Richard Haass is currently President of the Council on Foreign Relations and a member of the North American Group of the Trilateral Commission.

[This was the year after the Oklahoma City bombing during the Clinton administration, an event with many similar characteristics and a harbinger of things to come. –ed]

One year before the 9/11 terrorist attack (in 2000) the Project for the New American Century, a CFR-Trilateral Commission front organization, published a monograph titled “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” that stated:

 

“Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.” [17]

When Condoleezza Rice testified before the 9/11 Commission, she was asked why the Bush administration didn’t take defensive measures and try to prevent the terrorist attack. Thomas Kean’s book, “Without Precedent”, describes the encounter:

 

“Jamie Gorelick pressed the issue of why the Bush administration had not held senior-level meetings on counterterrorism before September 2001, and why more had not been done to take defensive measures in response to the threat reporting over the spring and summer . . . . Rice pointed out that the nation simply wasn’t prepared to take dramatic action against al Qaeda before 9/11 – either abroad or in reforming government at home – and said:

‘Until there is a catastrophic event that forces people to think differently, that forces people to overcome all customs and old culture and old fears about domestic intelligence . . . you don’t get that kind of change.'” [18]

Prior to the 9/11 attack, the American people cherished freedom, feared government surveillance, and didn’t want to go to war. The “catastrophic and catalyzing” event that took place on 9/11/2001 precipitated the current war in the Middle East, forced the public to “overcome all customs and old culture and old fears about domestic intelligence”. [It] led to the enactment of the Patriot Act, The Office of Homeland Security Act, the Model Emergency State Health Powers Act, the Military Commissions Act that suspends habeus corpus and legalizes torture, and the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act which suspends the Posse Comitatus Act and permits the use of National Guard troops against American citizens.

Condoleezza Rice (CFR) mentioned the need for “domestic intelligence”. Richard Haass (CFR-TC) mentioned the need for “more frequent phone taps and surveillance”.

Condoleezza Rice said the Bush administration needed a “catastrophic event” [to change the “old culture” –ed], the Project for the New American Century claimed the government needed a “catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor,” and Donald Rumsfeld told the 9/11 Commission the Bush administration was “putting together a more ‘comprehensive policy’ to go after al Qaeda than the Clinton administration’s, a process that did not conclude until September 10, 2001.” The Bush administration’s plan was [allegedly] completed the day before the 9/11 attack. [19]

 

Crime and Coverup

What did happen on 9/11? The Bush administration claims [that] 19 Islamic terrorists hijacked four commercial airplanes and crashed them into the Twin Towers [of the World Trade Center] and the Pentagon. Is that true? There are several other plausible explanations.

Some people believe the [Israeli] Mossad was responsible for the attack. Other people believe Pakistan, or Saudi Arabia, or Iraq, or Iran were responsible for the attack. There is a great deal of evidence that supports each of these views. One thing is certain. If you analyze all the evidence that is available, it is obvious that someone, or some powerful organization, has planted volumes of misleading information in the media in an effort to confuse the American people and prevent them from learning what really happened.

Immediately after the 9/11 attack the Bush administration ordered government agencies to “classify” all documents that dealt with the terrorist attack because the Bush administration didn’t want Osama bin Laden to discover what the U.S. knew about the hijackings before the 9/11 attack. Is that the real reason the information was withheld, or was the Bush administration trying to conceal the truth from the American people? [20]

Prior to the 9/11 attack, George Tenet testified before several Congressional committees, and told them al Qaeda was “the major threat to the U.S.,” but, according to Richard Clarke, CIA officials refused to monitor the terrorist organization. [21]

President Clinton’s Justice Department told the CIA to kill Osama bin Laden, but the CIA didn’t carry out the assignment. Why? [22]

Richard Clarke claims he told Condoleezza Rice about the danger of a terrorist attack. Condoleezza Rice claims she wasn’t aware of the problem. [23] George Tenet claims he told Condoleezza Rice about the coming attack in July 2001. When Condoleezza Rice was asked about the meeting, she stated that:

 

“…it was ‘incomprehensible’ that she would have ignored such explicit intelligence from senior CIA officials and that she received no warning at the meeting of an attack within the United States.” [24]

Condoleezza Rice told the 9/11 Commission she read the August 6, 2001, Presidential Daily Briefing (PDB) titled “Bin Laden determined to attack inside the U.S.” that stated: “FBI information since that time indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks.” When Condoleezza Rice was asked why she didn’t try to prevent the terrorist attack after she read the PDB, she said the document didn’t mention a specific target, a specific date, or the use of a plane as a weapon, so she decided to ignore the information. [25]

Following the 9/11 attack, no one was faulted for dereliction of duty, no one was demoted, no one was criticized, and no one was fired. Why did that happen? [26]

The families of the victims wanted to know why NORAD [North American Air Defense] didn’t send fighter planes to intercept the hijacked airliners [which was standard procedure –ed], and why there was no air protection over Washington D.C. President Bush tried to block a Congressional investigation because he claimed it would detract from “the war on terrorism.” Dick Cheney claimed the U.S. should be trying to stop another terrorist attack rather than trying to determine the cause of the first one. [27]

When Congress asked the Joint Select Intelligence Committee to investigate the tragedy, the Bush administration provided hundreds of boxes of extraneous information, delayed the release of vital information, withheld important documents, and censored the Committee’s report to prevent the release of “classified information.”

I read most of the testimony that was heard by the Joint Select Intelligence Committee, and I read their report. Most of the important information was deleted because the men who “co-chaired” the Joint Select Intelligence Committee Inquiry, Congressman Porter Goss and Senator Bob Graham were members of the CFR.

The same thing happened when Congress authorized the 9/11 Commission. President Bush tried to block the investigation, tried to have Henry Kissinger (CFR-TC) lead the Commission, and eventually accepted the appointment of Thomas Kean (CFR) as chairman, Lee Hamilton (CFR-TC) as vice-chairman, Philip Zelikow (CFR) as executive director. Three of the other eight commissioners were [also] members of the CFR. [28]

What happened on 9/11? There are three possible explanations.

 

  1. The Bush administration’s explanation is correct
  2. The intelligence community knew the attack was coming, and didn’t intervene
  3. Someone or some group [of insiders –ed] orchestrated the 9/11 attack

Almost 3000 Americans died on 9/11, and many more would have perished if Rick Rescorla, the Chief of Security at Morgan Stanley, hadn’t countermanded the order that was given over the public address system in the South Tower that told people to remain at their desk. Rick Rescorla evacuated 2700 people who worked for Morgan Stanley; most of the people who obeyed the order that was given over the public address system perished when the building collapsed, and no one has tried to determine who gave the order. [29] We dishonor the people who died on 9/11 if we don’t try to determine who is responsible for their deaths.

If you read the testimony before the “Joint Intelligence Committee,” the “Joint Intelligence Committee Report,” the testimony before the ” 9/11 Commission,” the “9/11 Staff Committee Report,” the “9/11 Commission Report,” Thomas Kean’s book “Without Precedent”, Richard Allen’s book, “Against All Enemies”, Paul Thompson’s book, “Terror Timeline”, the information at http://www.cooperativeresearch.org, and watch the DVDs that are available from Radio Liberty, you will realize someone or some powerful group orchestrated the 9/11 attack. The tape recordings of the conversations that took place between the FAA and the military personnel at NORAD on 9/11 document what happened. [30] [In the next chapter,] I will tell you what happened, and conclude this [report].

The Novus Ordo Seclorum

I began this [chapter] by asking two questions: What is the “New Order of the Ages?” and Who is the “Author of Liberty?”.

The phrase “new order of the ages” refers to the term “Novus Ordo Seclorum” that appears on the back of the dollar bill beneath the occult pyramid that is displayed there. The term refers to the coming world government. [31]

Who is the “Author of Liberty?” Christians believe [that] Jesus Christ is the Author of Liberty because “where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.” [32] Occultists believe Lucifer is the Author of Liberty because he offers freedom without restraints. Which concept did President Bush embrace in the closing segment of his Second Inaugural Address?

I am certain President Bush didn’t write that speech, or most of his other speeches. I believe the address was crafted by a professional speech writer who understands the Plan for world government. Michael Gerson was President Bush’s chief speech writer at that time. Recently he left his job at the White House and accepted a position at the CFR. [33]

Many people are frightened [by what is happening]. Halliburton was given $385 million to build “detention camps” in the U.S., and legislation has been enacted that allows the President to declare Martial Law if there is a national disaster, an epidemic, or civil unrest. [34] Can we preserve our liberty? We can if we remember the source of our freedom, and transmit the information to others. This is an appropriate time to recall the words that motivated the courageous men who created our nation. Thomas Paine wrote,

 

“Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one… Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it.”

“These are the times that try men’s souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly. . . .” [35]

The Word of God was important to the men who founded our nation because it revealed the spiritual condition that existed at that time: “. . . where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.” [see note E1]

[snip]

 

Notes

6. George W. Bush, “Inaugural Address“, Jan 20, 2005

7. Carroll Quigley, “Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World In Our Time”, The Macmillan Company, New York, 1966, pp 1285-87.

8.Asia Searches for Security in Trade“, Asia Times, Nov 16 2006

9. “Building a North American Community: Report of an Independent Task Force”, Council on Foreign Relations, May 2005, p.1.

10. Ibid., p. XVII.

11. Dr. Michael Coffman, “World Events and Prophecy”, DVD (available from Radio Liberty)

12. “Building a North American Community”, op. cit.

13. Zbigniew Brzezinski made the statement: personal communication, Dr. Dennis Cuddy.

14. George W. Bush, Remarks to the U.N. General Assembly, Nov 10, 2001

15. U.S. State Department, “How to Identify Misinformation

16. Richard Haass, “‘Land of the Free’ Makes a Tempting Target”, The Palm Beach Post, August 4, 1996, Sunday, Final Edition.

17. “Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century”, http://www.newamericancentury.com

18. Thomas Kean et al, “Without Precedent: The Inside Story of the 9/11 Commission”, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 2006, p. 180.

19. Ibid., p. 160.

20.9/11 Panel Says Too Many Documents Stamped Secret“, Scripps Howard News Service, May 14, 2004

21. Richard Clarke, “Against All Enemies”, Free Press, New York, 2004, p. 210.

22. Ibid., p. 204

23. Ibid., p. 228.

24.Tenet Recalled Warning Rice“, Washington Post, Oct 3, 2006

25. http://cnn.allpolitics.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=cpt&title=CNN.com+-+Whit…

26.Senior CIA Officer Hits 9/11 Panel“, CBS News, Aug 17, 2004

27.9/11 Press for Truth“, (DVD available from Radio Liberty)

28.Several Members of 9/11 Commission are CFR Members“, Infowars.com, Apr 8, 2004

29.The Man Who Predicted 9/11“, Sooner Magazine, Summer 2006

30. Michael Bronner, “9/11 Live: The Norad Tapes”, Vanity Fair, September 2006, pp 262-85.

31. http://www.users.cloud9.net/~bradmcc/cgi-bin/vulmag3.pl?i=150$sq/cycle.html%23city$

32. 2 Corinthians 3:17, Holy Bible, King James Version.

33.Bush Gets a New Voice for Second Term“, Newsweek Online, Jan 5, 2005. See also: CFR biography

34.Homeland Security To Build Detention Camps In The United States“, Guerilla News Network, Jan 24, 2006.

35. John Bartlett, “Familiar Quotations”, Little Brown and Company, Boston, 1980, p. 384.

 

Editor’s notes:

 

E1. Many of the American founders, including George Washington, were Christians. However, Thomas Paine was a self-proclaimed Deist, who believed in a direct relationship with the Creator without the need for religion, priests or sacred texts. Paine wrote:

“Deism, from the Latin word Deus, God, is the belief of a God, and this belief is the first article of every man’s creed. It is on this article, universally consented to by all mankind, that the Deist builds his church, and here he rests. Whenever we step aside from this article, by mixing it with articles of human invention, we wander into a labyrinth of uncertainty and fable, and become exposed to every kind of imposition by pretenders to revelation.”

— Thomas Paine, “Of the Religion of Deism Compared with the Christian Religion”

MHP hyperlink version for non-profit educational purposes only

 

Chapter 4: Surpise, Surprise
Denying the advance knowledge of the 9/11 attack plan

Willful Ignorance

[We] discussed some of the contradictory statements that have been made by high-ranking officials in reference to 9/11.

Prior to the attack, George Tenet (DCIA) told members of Congress that al Qaeda was “the major threat to the United States,” but Richard Clarke claims George Tenet’s real policy:

“. . . was also in sharp contrast to the attitude in the Counterterrorism Center at CIA, which by 1997 was led by the hard-charging Cofer Black. Black wanted to destroy al Qaeda as much as I did, if only the Directorate of Operations would let him.” [5]

[Journalist] Bob Woodward claims George Tenet and J. Cofer Black met with Condoleezza Rice on July 10, 2001, and “begged her to take action on an imminent terrorist attack.” When Rice was asked about Bob Woodward’s statement, she said she didn’t recall the meeting, and noted:

“It was ‘incomprehensible’ that she would have ignored such explicit intelligence from senior CIA officials and that she received no warning at the meeting of an attack within the United States.” [6]

But Sean McCormack, Condoleeza Rice’s spokesman, told the media:

“The information presented in this meeting was not new, rather it was a good summary from the threat reporting from the previous several weeks. . . .” [7]

Thomas Pickard, the Acting Director of the FBI in 2001, told the 9/11 Commission staff that [Attorney General] John Ashcroft told him that “he did not want to hear” additional information about the possibility of terrorist attacks, but John Ashcroft denied making that statement. [8]

Richard Clarke claims he warned Condoleezza Rice about the threat. [9] Condoleezza Rice claims she doesn’t remember Richard Clarke’s warnings. [10]

President Clinton claims he told the CIA to kill Osama bin Laden, but the CIA didn’t carry out his instructions. [11]

It is obvious that some of the officials were lying. Were they all lying? Is there an intentional effort to confuse the American people? Is someone, or some group, trying to conceal what happened on 9/11? Thomas Kean discussed that issue in his book, “Without Precedent”:

“If the military had had the amount of time they said they had – forty-seven minutes to shoot down United 93, or even fourteen minutes to shoot down American 77 – and had scrambled their jets, it was hard to figure how they had failed to shoot down at least one of the planes. A careful examination of the facts compared with the NORAD account also revealed other problems – it just didn’t make sense why NORAD’s scrambled aircraft were sent out over the Atlantic Ocean if they were pursuing United 93 and American 77. . . .

Our staff . . . could not explain why all of the after-action reports, accident investigations, and public testimony by FAA and NORAD officials advanced an account of 9/11 that was untrue.” [12]

Prior to 9/11/2001, when there was a suspected hijacking, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) contacted the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), and they immediately scrambled their fighters to intercept the plane. Why didn’t the FAA immediately contact NORAD on 9/11? Why didn’t NORAD immediately scramble their planes and try to intercept the hijacked airliners? Many people believe there was a “stand down order” that morning that required the FAA and NORAD to obtain permission to act. [13]

Heroes and Villans

Twenty-nine hundred and eighty-five (2985) Americans [and others –ed] died on September 11, 2001. The bodies of over eleven hundred (1100) people have not been recovered. What happened to them? Were they crushed when the Twin Towers collapsed? Were they vaporized when the buildings exploded? Another twenty-seven hundred (2700) people would have perished if Rick Rescorla had obeyed the order he was given and kept the Morgan Stanley employees who worked in the South Tower at their desks. Michael Grunwald’s book, “A Tower of Courage”, describes what happened that morning:

“‘You watching TV?’ Rick Rescorla was calling from the 44th floor of the World Trade Center, icy calm in the crisis . . . he was president for corporate security at Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., and a jumbo jet had just plowed into the North tower.

The voices of officialdom were crackling over the loudspeakers in the South tower, urging everyone to stay put: ‘Please do not leave the building. This area is secure.’ Rescorla was ignoring them.

‘The dumb sons of bitches told me not to evacuate,’ he said during a quick call to his best friend, Dan Hill, who had indeed been watching the disaster unfolding on TV. ‘They said it’s just Building One. I told them I’m getting my people the (expletive) out of here.'” [14]

Rick Rescorla ran up and down the corridors of the 43rd and 44th floor of the South Tower ordering workers to ignore the instructions being broadcast over the public address system and leave the building. He herded 2700 Morgan Stanley employees out of the South Tower, and then returned to the building to make certain that all the employees had left. Rick Rescorla perished when the building collapsed.

Immediately after the attack, and for several days thereafter, the public was told that 6,000 people died during the attack. Who provided that estimate? Did the number include the 2,700 Morgan Stanley employees who survived? Were they supposed to die? Who told Rick Rescorla to keep the Morgan Stanley employees at their desks? Who gave the order that was broadcast over the public address system that told people to remain in the building?

Why didn’t the FAA immediately contact NORAD and tell them about the hijacked planes? Why didn’t NORAD immediately scramble their fighter planes? Was there a “stand down” order that morning? Who was in charge? Was the military in charge? Was [Defense Secretary] Donald Rumsfeld in charge? Was Vice President Dick Cheney in charge? Where were the fighter planes that were stationed at Andrews Air Force Base to defend Washington D.C.? Why was there no air defense for our nation that morning?

Why did WTC Building 7 collapse eight-and-a-half hours after the terrorist attack? How did the passport of one of the hijackers get out of the flaming inferno that consumed the North Tower, and float to the sidewalk a block-and-a-half away from the burning building? How did the passport of another Moslem terrorist survive the flaming inferno that consumed American Flight 93, the contents of the plane, and all the passengers? The FBI displayed a picture of the second passport on their web site for several days; it was removed, and hasn’t been displayed again.

How did the Bush administration respond to the attack? President Bush visited the CIA and congratulated the agents for a job well done. No one was censored for dereliction of duty, no one was fired, no one was punished, and no one has tried to determine the source of the fatal order that was broadcast over the public address system in the South Tower on 9/11, or who told Rick Rescorla not to evacuate the building.

What did the Bush administration do? They “classified” all the documents that dealt with the 9/11 attack, they told government employees they could not discuss what happened, they blocked repeated efforts to determine the cause of the tragedy, and most of the documents that reveal what happened on 9/11 remain “classified” today. Why doesn’t the Bush administration declassify the documents and encourage people to come forward and tell the American people what happened?

Advance Knowledge

There are three possible explanations for the event. (1) The official explanation of 9/11 is correct. (2) Some high-ranking officials knew the attack was coming, and didn’t try to prevent it because they wanted an excuse to go to war. (3) A covert group orchestrated the attack, and is trying to conceal the truth from the American people.

Initially, I accepted the Bush administration’s claim that no one had foreknowledge of the attack, but I changed my opinion when I read an article that was published in the early edition of the San Francisco Chronicle on September 12, 2001, that stated:

“For Mayor Willie Brown, the first signs that something was amiss came late Monday when he got a call from what he described as his airport security – a full eight hours before yesterday’s string of terrorist attacks – advising him that Americans should be cautious about their air travel. The mayor, who was booked to fly to New York yesterday morning from San Francisco International Airport, said the call . . . ‘was not an abnormal call. I’m always concerned if my flight is going to be on time, and they always alert me when I ought to be careful.'” [15]

I called Mayor Brown’s office and talked to his public relations advisor who confirmed the story. At that point, I suspected someone, or some group, knew the attack was coming and didn’t warn the American people. Other events confirmed that suspicion. One of my friends tried to obtain a copy of the San Francisco Chronicle article at his local library and discovered the story wasn’t printed in the second edition of the newspaper. Another friend tried to get a copy of the article from the newspaper’s web site, but it wasn’t posted there. Who had the ability to remove the article from the newspaper? Who had the authority to delete the article from the web site?

The same thing happened to the Andrews Air Force Base web site and the Northwest Airline Flight Attendants web site. The Andrews Air Force Base (AAFB) web site listed the fighter planes that were stationed at AAFB on 9/11, the NorthWest Airlines Flight Attendants web site carried an article that discussed “the use of hijacked airliners as terrorist cruise missiles.” The information posted on the two web sites was immediately removed after the terrorist attack, and is not available today. Who removed the articles? What happened to the fighter planes that were supposed to protect Washington, D.C., on 9/11? [16]

The July 2001 article posted on the Northwest Airlines Flight Attendant’s web site described the [planned] terrorist attack:

“The use of hijacked airliners as terrorist cruise missiles has been known to be a tactic used by terrorists linked to Osama Bin Laden since 1995. . . . The airliner terrorism was outlined as part of a terrorist operation code-named ‘Project Bojinka.’ The operation called for hijacking U.S.-bound commercial airliners. . . . The hijacked aircraft were to be crashed into structures in the United States, including the World Trade Center, the White House, Pentagon, the Transamerica tower in San Francisco and the Sears Tower in Chicago.” [17]

U.S. officials learned about Project Bojinka shortly after Abdul Hakim Murad was arrested in the Philippines in January 1995. Murad worked for Ramsi Youssef who tried to blow up a Philippine airliner in 1994, and planned to blow up ten U.S. passenger planes, kill the Pope, and crash hijacked passenger planes into U.S. buildings. Peter Lance interviewed the Philippine officials who uncovered “Project Bojinka,” and wrote:

“Later, Philippines secretary Rigoberto ‘Bobby’ Tiglao told CNN Manila bureau chief Maria Ressa that in addition to the CIA, Pentagon and the nuclear facility, the other targets revealed by Murad included the Transamerica Tower in San Francisco, the Sears Tower in Chicago . . . and the World Trade Center.” [18]

We know that U.S. officials knew about the terrorists’ plan because Jamie Gorelick, a member of the 9/11 Commission, mentioned the “conspiracy to bomb United States airlines recently uncovered in the Philippines” in “The Infamous Wall Memo” she wrote in March 1995. The memo was declassified on April 10, 2004, and states in part:

“The criminal investigations will focus on the indicted cases of United States v. Yousef, et al, and United States v. Rahman, et al. . . . The criminal investigations will also focus on the conspiracy to bomb United States airlines recently uncovered in the Philippines and the bombing of a Philippine airliner.” [19]

When Kristin Breitweiser [who lost her husband in the attack –ed] testified before the Joint Intelligence Committee on September 18, 2002, she revealed the U.S. military was aware of the terrorists’ plan to hijack American airplanes and crash them into buildings. You can read the complete text of Kristin Breitweiser’s testimony at http://www.radioliberty.com. She stated:

“In 1993 a $150,000 study was commissioned by the Pentagon to investigate the possibility of an airplane being used to bomb national landmarks. A draft document of this was circulated throughout the Pentagon, the Justice Department and to FEMA.

In 1994 a disgruntled FEDEX employee invaded the cockpit of a DC-10 with plans to crash it into a company building in Memphis.

In 1994 an Air France flight was hijacked by members of the Armed Islamic Group with the intent to crash the plane into the Eiffel Tower.

In January 1995 Philippine authorities investigating Abdul Murad, an Islamic terrorist, unearthed ‘Project Bojinka.’ Project Bojinka’s primary objective was to blow up 11 airliners over the Pacific, and in the alternative, several planes were to be hijacked and flown into civilian targets in the U.S. Among the targets mentioned were CIA headquarters, the World Trade Center, the Sears Tower, and the White House. . . .

In 1997 this plot resurfaced during the trial of Ramsi Youssef – the mastermind behind the 1993 bombings of the World Trade Center. During the trial, FBI agents testified that ‘the plan targeted not only the CIA but other U.S. government buildings in Washington, including the Pentagon.’

In September 1999, a report . . . was prepared for U.S. intelligence by the Federal Research Division. . . . It stated, ‘Suicide bombers belonging to al Qaeda’s Martyrdom Battalion could crash-land an aircraft packed with high explosives . . . into the Pentagon, the headquarters of the CIA, or the White House.'” [20]

On April 18, 2004, USA Today published an article titled, “NORAD Had Drills of Jets as Weapons,” which stated:

“In the two years before the Sept. 11 attacks, the North American Aerospace Defense Command conducted exercises simulating what the White House says was unimaginable at the time: hijacked airliners used as weapons to crash into targets and cause mass casualties.

One of the imagined targets was the World Trade Center. . . . In a third scenario, the target was the Pentagon. . . .

NORAD, in a written statement, confirmed that such hijacking exercises occurred.” [21]

Lauro (L.J.) Chavez confirmed that information when I interviewed him in September 2006. He had written in an article:

“I was a Sergeant in the United States Army. Not only this, but I was stationed at United States Central Command, which is located at MacDill AFB in Tampa, Florida. I was on active duty when 9-11 happened. In the days prior to the tragedies, we were involved in many exercises. Some of these exercises included the scenarios of hijacked planes crashing into our building, the World Trade Center, the White House, Sears Tower, and the Pentagon. These drills or exercises as we called them, were classified Top Secret. Having a Top Secret rated clearance I was dumbfounded that they would ever push a training exercise above the level of Secret. Over my 8 years in the Army, I had participated in many exercises around the world, none of which were ever classified over the Secret level.” [22]

Who concealed the fact that the military participated in a number of exercises that simulated “hijacked planes crashing into our buildings” before 9/11? Condoleezza Rice held a press conference shortly after the terrorist attack, and told the reporters:

No one could have imagined them taking a plane, slamming it into the Pentagon (and) into the World Trade Center, using planes as a missile.[23]

Was Condoleezza Rice telling the truth? Condoleezza Rice had access to the same information that Kristin Breitweiser, Lauro Chavez, Peter Lance, and the author of the USA Today article had, and she told the 9/11 Commission that she read the August 6 Presidential Daily Briefing (PDB) that stated:

 

“Bin Laden Determined To Strike in U.S.

Clandestine, foreign government, and media reports indicate Bin Ladin since 1997 has wanted to conduct terrorist attacks in the US. Bin Ladin implied in US television interviews in 1997 and 1998 that his followers would follow the example of World Trade Center bomber Ramzi Yousef and ‘bring the fighting to America’. . . .

FBI information since that time indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of Federal buildings in New York.” [24]

Overcoming the “Old Culture”

What did Vice President Dick Cheney, Condoleezza Rice, and the other key members of the Bush administration do after they read the August 6 PDB brief? They didn’t do anything. Thomas Kean’s book, “Without Precedent”, describes an exchange that took place during the 9/11 Commission Hearing when Jamie Gorelick questioned Condoleezza Rice, and asked her:

“. . . why the Bush administration had not held senior-level meetings on counterterrorism before September 2001, and why more had not been done to take defensive measures in response to the threat reporting over the spring and summer. . . .

Rice pointed out that the nation simply wasn’t prepared to take dramatic action against al Qaeda before 9/11 – either abroad or in reforming government at home – and said, ‘Until there is a catastrophic event that forces people to think differently, that forces people to overcome all customs and old culture and old fears about domestic intelligence . . . that you don’t get that kind of change.'” [25]

The 9/11 attack was a “catastrophe” that “forced people to think differently…to overcome all customs and old culture and old fears about domestic intelligence”. The 9/11 attack changed America forever.

The September 2006 edition of Vanity Fair magazine contains an article by Michael Bronner that discusses the 9/11 NORAD and FAA tapes, and Bronner’s interviews with the officials who supervised the response that morning. Colonel Marr, the commanding officer at North East Air Defense System (NEADS), told Bronner:

“I’ll be the first to admit that immediately after – in fact, for a long time after – we were very confused with who was what and where, what reports were coming in. I think with having 29 different reports of hijackings nationwide, for us it was next to impossible to try and get back there and figure out the fidelity . . . that the 9/11 commission ended up being able to show.” [26]

Someone, or some group, projected hundreds of false images onto radar screens on 9/11 that simulated 29 hijackings. They obviously had sophisticated equipment, and knew how to use it. I will publish the complete text of Lauro Chavez’s article next month.

I close with two quotations. The first was written by Dr. David Ray Griffin, Professor of Religion and Theology, Emeritus, at the Claremont School of Theology:

“If the 9/11 attacks were orchestrated or at least deliberately allowed by the Bush-Cheney administration and the Pentagon, then the motivation to cover up this murderous and treasonous act would be unlimited. No expenditure of time and money would be considered too great.” [27]

The second quotation comes from Psalm 111:

“The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom: a good understanding have all they that do his commandments: his praise endureth for ever.”

— Psalm 111:10

 

Notes

5. Richard Clarke, “Against All Enemies”, Free Press, New York, 2004, p. 210

6.Tenet Recalled Warning Rice“, Washington Post, Oct 3, 2006

7.Rumsfeld, Ashcroft Received Warning of al-Qaida Attack Before 9/11“, McClatchy Newspapers, Oct 2, 2006, p. 2

8.Another Smoking Gun: Condi and Crew Knew!“, NY911Truth.org, citing Bob Woodward, et. al.

9. Richard Clarke, op. cit., p. 228.

10.Excerpts from April 8, 2004 Testimony of Dr. Condoleezza Rice Before the 9/11 Commission“, The National Security Archive

11. Richard Clarke, op. cit., p. 204.

12. Thomas Kean et al, Without Precedent, Alfred Knopf, New York, 2006, pp. 259-61

13. David Ray Griffin, 9/11 Live or Fabricated: Do the NORAD Tapes Verify The 9/11 Commission Report?, Sep 4, 2006

14. “A Tower of Courage”, Washington Post, Oct 26, 2001

15. “Willie Brown Got Low-key Early Warning About Air Travel,” San Francisco Chronicle, September 12, 2001, Bay Area Section

16.NORAD Stand Down“, 911 Research website

17.U.S. Airlines May Be a Terror Risk“, AirJet Airline World News, Jun 24, 2001, posted at Northwest Airlines Flight Attendants website.

[Note: This article, as retrieved from web.archive.org, describes Project Bojinka as a “plot to blow up 12 U.S. airliners” but does not mention crashing them into buildings. –ed]

18. Peter Lance, “Triple Cross”, Regan, 2006, p. 184

19. Ibid., p. 550

20. Kristin Breitweiser, Testimony, Joint Select Committee, September 18, 2002

21.NORAD had Drills of Jets as Weapons“, USA Today, Apr 18, 2004

22. Sgt. Lauro Chavez, “Letter to the Cincinnati Post“, Aug 3, 2006

23.Transcript of Rice’s 9/11 commission statement“, CNN.com, May 19, 2004

24. Presidential Daily Briefing, August 6, 2001. Available from Radio Liberty.

25. Thomas Kean, op. cit., p. 180.

26. Michael Bronner, “9/11 Live: The NORAD Tapes,” Vanity Fair, September 2006, p. 285

27. David Ray Griffin, op. cit.

MHP hyperlink version for non-profit educational purposes only

 

 

Chapter 5: Conclusion
Foreknowledge, coverup, and the march of Empire

Summary

I promised to explain what happened on 9/11, but before I can do that I must summarize the information that was covered in my “Foreknowledge 911” pamphlets, and the current series of Radio Liberty letters.

1. The Cabal that controls our nation fomented the genocidal wars and the bloody revolutions of the twentieth century because they hate Christian civilization, and want world government. [4]

2. The Cabal financed the Moslem Brotherhood (1928), installed the radical regime that rules Iran today (1979), precipitated the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan (1979), promoted the resurgence of radical Islam (1980-1989), and financed al Qaeda and the Taliban. [5]

3. The current war in the Middle East was planned before the 9/11 attack.

  • Zbigniew Brzezinski‘s (CFR-TC) 1997 book, “The Grand Chessboard”, advocated U.S. control of the Middle East and stated the U.S. “may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstances of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat.” [6]
  • The United States Commission on Security/21st Century (CFR) Phase I Report (1998) discussed the coming terrorist attack. [7]
  • The Project For The New American Century (CFR) sent a letter to President Clinton on January 26, 1998, that advocated undertaking “military action” to remove “Saddam Hussein and his regime from power.” [8]
  • Project For The New American Century published “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” (2000) which cited “the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein,” and noted it would be difficult to transform the U.S. military without a “catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.” [9]
  • The National Commission on Terrorism (Paul Bremer) Report (2000) discussed the terrorist threat, and how officials could convince the public they had no idea an attack was coming. [10]
  • February 2001, [Treasury Secretary] Paul O’Neil heard Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, and Donald Rumsfeld discuss the need for a “preemptive attack” on Iraq. [11]
  • July 2001: U.S. officials told India and Pakistan about the impending attack on Afghanistan. [12]

4. The Cabal is using the contrived “war on terror” to curtail our freedom.

  • Richard Haass (CFR) wrote an article (1996) that discussed the growing terrorist threat, the need to “accept longer lines before entering buildings, longer delays at airports, more intrusive searches of belongings and our persons” and the “willingness to compromise some of our civil liberties, including accepting more frequent phone taps and surveillance.” [13]
  • Condoleezza Rice told the 9/11 Commission the Bush administration didn’t address the terrorist threat because the nation “simply wasn’t prepared to take dramatic action against al Qaeda before 9/11” – and said, “Until there is a catastrophic event that forces people to think differently, that forces people to overcome all customs and old culture and old fears about domestic intelligence . . . you don’t get that kind of change.” [14]

5. The Cabal is trying to inflame the Moslem world and precipitate World War III. [15]

Whistleblowers Silenced

Why hasn’t someone come forward and told the American people what happened on 9/11? Because the information is “classified.” If a government employee tells the truth, he risks imprisonment, the loss of his job, and possibly the loss of his life. What would the public do if they learned the Bush administration “staged” the 9/11 attack in order to justify the current war in the Middle East? Professor David Ray Griffin addressed that issue when he wrote:

“If the 9/11 attacks were orchestrated or at least deliberately allowed by the Bush-Cheney administration and the Pentagon, then the motivation to cover up this murderous and treasonous act would be unlimited. No expenditure of time and money would be considered too great.” [16]

[And yet,] several people have come forward.

Lt. Col. Steve Butler was the vice chancellor for student affairs at the Defense Language Institute in Monterey, California, until he wrote an article that was published in the Monterey Herald on June 5, 2002, that stated:

“Of course President Bush knew about the impending attacks on America. He did nothing to warn the American people because he needed this war on terrorism.”

Why did Lt. Col. Butler make that statement? Because one of the [alleged] 9/11 hijackers, a Moslem named Saeed Alghamdi, was a student at the Defense Language Institute where Lt. Col. Butler was dean of student affairs, and Saeed must have been working for the U.S. government at that time. What happened to Col. Butler? He was relieved of his command, transferred to another post, ordered to cease talking about the hijacking, and forced to retire from military service. [17]

Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer worked with a military intelligence unit (code named “Able Danger”) that tracked Mohamed Atta, and three other hijackers, in 2000. The unit tried to share their information with the FBI before the 9/11 attack, but Pentagon officials cancelled the meeting. Lt. Col. Shaffer was asked to testify before a closed session of the 9/11 Commission, but wasn’t allowed to testify in public. The 9/11 Commission suppressed his information, and the Pentagon destroyed the Able Danger file.

When Lt. Col. Shaffer was asked to appear before a Senate Committee, the Defense Department ordered him not to testify. When Congressman Curt Weldon tried to investigate Anthony Shaffer’s story, the Pentagon blocked the investigation, and the Justice Department launched a criminal investigation of Congressman Weldon’s daughter in an effort to intimidate Congressman Weldon and block his bid for re-election. [18] The Defense Department canceled Lt. Col. Shaffer’s Top Secret security clearance and ended his military career.

William Rodriguez, [a WTC maintenance man], was standing on the top floor of the basement complex of the North Tower talking to his supervisor on September 11, 2001, when both men were suddenly shaken by a massive explosion that took place in the basement below them. Several seconds later American Flight 11 struck the North Tower and shook the building again. Felipe David was working on a lower floor of the basement complex and was badly burned by a fiery blast; he ran upstairs, encountered William Rodriguez, and was sent to the hospital for treatment.

William Rodriguez led 15 people out of the North Tower, then returned to the building to help the firefighters evacuate hundreds of people from the building. He was the last person to escape from the North Tower before it collapsed, and was initially praised as a hero, but when William Rodriguez began talking about the explosion that took place in the basement of the building before American Flight 11 struck the North Tower, he started receiving threatening telephone calls, someone broke into his home on two occasions, someone blocked his effort to get another job, he lost his apartment, and ended up sleeping under a bridge for a time.

William Rodriguez continued trying to tell the public what happened, but the media suppressed his message. He testified before a closed session of the 9/11 Commission, but wasn’t allowed to testify in public. His story wasn’t included in the 9/11 Commission Report, and his information was sealed in the National Archives for 50 years so the public wouldn’t learn what happened on 9/11. [19]

Similar things have happened to other people.

Jimmy Walter, [a millionaire activist], believed the official story of the 9/11 attack until he watched a video that showed the collapse of the Twin Towers, and noted that the buildings fell at the speed of gravity. Since Jimmy Walter had a background in engineering, he knew there would have been structural resistance if the towers had fallen by themselves, and realized there must have been explosives in the buildings.

In an effort to tell the American people what happened, Jimmy Walter purchased dozens of full-page ads in the New York Times and ran advertisements on several New York television stations, but the media didn’t cover his campaign and most people have never heard his message. Jimmy Walter began receiving threatening telephone calls, people broke into his home on several occasions, someone placed a massive boulder on his car, and he was told he would be killed if he remained in the United States. Jimmy Walter is living in seclusion somewhere in Europe today. [20]

Prof. Steven Jones taught physics at Brigham Young University and had an outstanding reputation, until he suggested that thermate, [a commonly used demolition explosive], was used to cut the steel beams that supported the central core of the WTC buildings. Someone launched a coordinated effort to discredit Professor Jones, and asked Brigham Young University to silence him. Professor Jones was forced to retire from his teaching position. [21]

Michael Ruppert’s book, “Crossing the Rubicon”, described the military exercise that was held on September 11, 2001 that simulated the hijacking of an airliner and delayed the military response to the “terrorist attack.” Michael Ruppert claims the FBI planted an informant in his office, disrupted his finances, and destroyed his records. Someone broke into his office and smashed his computers. As a result, Michael Ruppert fled from the United States, and went to another country. In November 2006, his adrenal glands and liver began to fail. He is currently being treated in Canada for what may be a fatal illness. Was he poisoned? [22]

L.J. (Lauro) Chavez wrote a Letter to the Editor of the Cincinnati Post in response to an article they published that supported the official version of 9/11. When the newspaper didn’t publish his article, he posted it on the Internet without considering the consequences. Shortly thereafter Lauro began receiving threatening telephone calls, someone put enough pressure on his employer that he lost his job, and someone published a series of Internet articles that questioned Chavez’s honesty and tried to discredit his information. [23] Part of his letter is reproduced below:

“I felt it necessary to follow up to a recent story that was published in [the] Cincinnati Post. It was the ‘1 in 3 Believe 9-11 Conspiracy Theory’. I must admit that at first I was overwhelmed with joy that our local paper was actually starting to have real journalism and talk about real issues. Then I read the story and it was a total debunk to make the actual people around the world who feel there was something not right about 9-11, to look like over-reacting conspiracy theorists. . . .

I’ll tell you some things that I have not told many people at all. From 1995 to 2002 I was a Sergeant in the United States Army. Not only this, but I was stationed at United States Central Command, which is located at MacDill AFB in Tampa, Florida. I was on active duty when 9-11 happened. In the days prior to the tragedies, we were involved in many exercises. Some of these exercises included the scenarios of hijacked planes crashing into our building, the World Trade Center, the White House, Sears Tower, and the Pentagon. These drills or exercises as we called them, were classified Top Secret. Having a Top Secret rated clearance I was dumbfounded that they would ever push a training exercise above the level of Secret. Over my 8 years in the Army, I had participated in many exercises around the world, none of which were ever classified over the Secret level.

I’ll start by saying a few months prior, it was announced by President Bush that Dick Cheney would be heading up operations over NORAD, our North American Aerospace Defense Command. Along with many of my peers, we were shocked. Over the years, if you research NORAD, it has always been under the command of a military officer. . . .

Back to the morning of 9-11; the command was busy with this training exercise. We were instructed to bring all our gear in to prep for a mock (staged) deployment to the Middle East. On the morning of 9-11 I had been on base prepped and ready to go since about 0400 am. During my time at the base that morning, they were setting up barriers around the command and placing gun posts on the roofs. When I questioned one of the security officers about the machine gun and shoulder fired rockets on the roof, I was given the answer – it’s a precaution for a plane attempting to crash into this building.

So, I was standing in the SCIF (Secure Compartmented Information Facility), which is basically this underground bunker command post for USCENTCOM, when the first plane hit. We were watching the fly patterns of all the planes on the aerospace grid. This contained not only all commercial flights at the time, but all military flights, and fake enemy planes that were supposedly put on there for the exercise. Many of the planes sent to intercept the fake blips were scrambled from Andrews which is an air defense AFB for the East Coast. They were sent across the US and left very few planes to defend the capital. After the first plane hit the tower we were all in disbelief. After the initial shock was over, our questions were ‘what are the odds this could happen for real during a training exercise that’s covering the same scenario?’ We were all at wits end. Then to top all of this off, Cheney gave NORAD the order to stand down scrambling jets to intercept. A few moments later tower 2 was hit. Only after the Pentagon was hit, did he give the orders to scramble the jets to intercept the plane bound for the White House. . . .

How is it possible to have a training exercise about planes hitting the WTC and then actually have planes hit the WTC? This kind of thing just does not happen unless it’s pre-planned. What reason would there be to have this type of exercise on that morning. I’ll tell you if you are placing fake planes all over the North American aerospace grid then you have no way of knowing which planes are real and which are fake. Then to thicken the plot you put a civilian in charge of NORAD so that the military does not have the power to initiate the order for jets to be scrambled to intercept. If the military would have still commanded power over NORAD they would have scrambled jets because they would have simply followed the procedures that had been in place for this type of situation for years and years, and scrambled jets.

To delve even further, as I’m standing there watching the towers collapse, next to me is one of my good friends and a former commander of the Army Corps of Engineers. He is a demolitions expert. He was even more surprised than me. When the towers collapsed he kept saying ‘this isn’t right, this isn’t right.’ When I asked him what he was talking about he told me that steel buildings don’t fall down that way, even if they are struck by objects; he went on to say that in theory if the top 10 floors were hit, then possibly just that part of the building would fall over and off, but the rest would remain standing. When I asked him, not understanding the implications of demolitions, he told me that it looked as if they were brought down by controlled demolitions. . . . ” [24]

Lauro Chavez made four important points:

1. Lauro claims the U.S. held a series of military exercises that simulated fighter planes trying to intercept hijacked airliners prior to the 9/11 attack. He could have obtained the information from the Internet, from James Bamford’s book, “Pretext For War”, from Webster Tarpley’s book, “9/11: Synthetic Terror”, or from Michael Ruppert’s book, “Crossing the Rubicon”, or Lauro Chavez could be telling the truth [based on his own experience –ed]. [25]

2. Lauro claims there were several military exercises on 9/11, and at least one of them simulated fighter planes trying to intercept a hijacked airliner. Michael Bronner’s Vanity Fair magazine article (September 2006) confirms Lauro’s statement, and is important because the 9/11 Commission and the Joint Select Commission concealed the information. Thomas Kean (CFR), the Chairman of the 9/11 Commission, tried to maintain the deception when he wrote:

“If the military had had the amount of time they said they had – forty-seven minutes to shoot down United 93, or even fourteen minutes to shoot down American 77 – and had scrambled their jets, it was hard to figure how they had failed to shoot down at least one of the planes. A careful examination of the facts compared with the NORAD account also revealed other problems – it just didn’t make sense why NORAD’s scrambled aircraft were sent out over the Atlantic Ocean if they were pursuing United 93 and American 77.” [26]

Thomas Kean (CFR) could have subpoenaed the Commanding Officer of Langley Air Force Base, and asked him why he ordered his fighter planes to fly over the Atlantic Ocean instead of sending them to Washington D.C. to defend the Pentagon, but Thomas Kean didn’t do that because he didn’t want to reveal the fact that someone inserted hundreds of false images on the FAA radar screens that were tracking the airline flights that morning. Michael Bronner’s article explains what happened:

“For the NEADS [Northeast Air Defense System] crew, 9/11 was not a story of four hijacked airplanes, but one of a heated chase after more than a dozen potential hijackings – some real, some phantom – that emerged from the turbulence of misinformation that spiked in the first 100 minutes of the attack and continued well into the afternoon and evening.” [27]

Colonel Marrs, the C.O. of NORAD, told Bronner:

“I think with having 29 different reports of hijackings nationwide, for us it was next to impossible to try and get back there and figure out the fidelity that the 9/11 Commission ended up being able to show.” [28]

The jets that were scrambled from Langley were trying to intercept the hijacked plane on radar that was flying toward Washington, D.C., at 9:20 a.m. – American Flight 11 – the plane that “crashed” into the North Tower at 8:46 a.m. Michael Bronner wrote:

“The call that sets off the latest alarm comes from Boston and is wholly confounding: according to Scoggins, the Boston manager, American 11, the plane they believed was the first one to hit the World Trade Center, is actually still flying – still hijacked – and now heading straight for D.C. Whatever hit the first tower, it wasn’t American 11. . . . The 9:21:50 call stated: ‘OK. American Airlines is still airborne – 11, the first guy. He’s heading towards Washington. O.K., I think we need to scramble Langley right now. And I’m – I’m gonna take the fighters from Otis and try to chase this guy down if I can find him.'” [29]

3. Lauro claims the fighter squadrons that were stationed at Andrews Air Force Base to defend Washington D.C. were sent to other regions to participate in military exercises.

4. Lauro claims there was a stand down order, and Dick Cheney was in charge of the military response that morning. That is important because [Transportation Secretary] Norman Minetta’s 9/11 Commission testimony confirms that. Minetta told the 9/11 Commission he was taken to the shelter conference room under the White House at 9:20 a.m. and,

“During the time that the airplane was coming in to the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President, ‘The plane is 50 miles out’, ‘the plane is 30 miles out’, and when it got down to ‘the plane is 10 miles out,’ the young man also said to the Vice President, ‘Do the orders still stand?’ And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said, ‘Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?'” [30]

Who and Why?

Who staged the 9/11 attack? The U.S. intelligence community. Why? They were told to. Why did the Bush administration order the attack? They wanted an excuse to go to war. How can we be certain that is true? Robert Baer worked for the CIA for 25 years. He wrote:

“The other day a reporter friend told me that one of the highest-ranking CIA officials had said to him, off the record, that when the dust finally clears, Americans will see that September 11 was a triumph for the intelligence community, not a failure.” [31]

The current war in the Middle East has killed over a half million people, and contaminated the region with depleted uranium that will kill and deform future generations. What can you and I do? You can circulate this series of letters and encourage people to watch the excellent videos that can be viewed on the Internet:

We must inform the public before the BOD imposes a military dictatorship on our nation. Will we succeed? Our job is to do our best. God will determine the outcome of our venture because:

By the light of burning martyrs, Christ, thy bleeding feet we track,
Toiling up new Calvaries ever, With the Cross that turns not back.
New occasions teach new duties; Time makes ancient good uncouth;
They must upward still and onward, Who would keep abreast of truth.

Though the cause of evil prosper, Yet ’tis truth alone is strong;
Though her portion be the scaffold, And upon the throne be wrong,
Yet that scaffold sways the future, And, behind the dim unknown,
Standeth God within the shadow, Keeping watch above his own.

Barbara and I appreciate your faithful support, and your prayers.

Yours in Christ,

Stanley Monteith

 

Notes

4. Stanley Monteith, “Iraq: The Untold Story“, syllabus and video

5. Robert Dreyfuss, “Devil’s Game”, Metropolitan Books, Henry Holt and Company, New York, 2005, p. 256.

6. Zbigniew Brzezinski, “The Grand Chessboard”, Basic Books, 1997, p. 211.

7. U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century, “Phase I Report”. See Also: “Commission Warned Bush“, Salon, Sep 12, 2001

8. Project for the New American Century, Letter to President Clinton on Iraq“, Jan 26, 1998

9. PNAC, “Rebuilding America’s Defenses“, Sep 2000, pp. 14 and 51.

10. Report of the National Commission on Terrorism, “Countering the Changing Threat of International Terrorism“, Govt Printing Office, Aug 2000

11. Ron Suskind, “The Price of Loyalty”, Simon & Schuster, New York, 2004, p. 96.

12.U.S. Government Informed Other Nations“, WhatReallyHappened.com. See also: “U.S. Planned Attack on Taleban“, BBC, Sep 18, 2001

13. Richard Haass, “‘Land of the Free’ Makes a Tempting Target,” Palm Beach Post, August 4, 1996, Available on yahoo.com

14. Thomas Kean, op. cit., p. 180.

15.No End to War“, The American Conservative, March 1, 2004

16. David Ray Griffin, “9/11 Live or Fabricated?“, page 17.

17. Steve Butler, “Letter to the Monterey Herald“, June 5, 2002

18.Officer: 9/11 Panel Didn’t Receive Key Information“, CNN, Aug 17, 2005

19. Greg Szymanski, “WTC Basement Blast And Injured Burn Victim Blows Official 9/11 Story Sky High“, Bellaciao.org, June 24, 2005.

20. Jimmy Walter website, Reopen911.org

21. Victoria Ashley, “Steven E. Jones: A Physics Professor Speaks Out on 9-11“, Jan 14, 2006

 

22. Mike Ruppert, “By the Light of a Burning Bridge“, Aug 16, 2006.

23.Lauro Chavez Clarifies Points For His Critics“, PrisonPlanet.com, Sep 26, 2006

24. Lauro Chavez, “Letter to the Cincinnati Post

25. Books available at Amazon.com

26. Thomas Kean et al, “Without Precedent”, Alfred Knopf, New York, 2006, p. 259.

27. Michael Bronner, “9/11 Live: The NORAD Tapes,” Vanity Fair, September 2006, p. 264.

28. Ibid., p. 285.

29. Ibid., p. 275.

30. Norman Mineta’s testimony, 9/11 Commission. See Also: “Flights 11, 175, 77, and 93: The 9/11 Commission’s Incredible Tales“, p.2.

31. Robert Baer, “See No Evil”, Crown, New York, 2002, preface, p.xix.

 

MHP hyperlink version for non-profit educational purposes only

 

http://www.modernhistoryproject.org/mhp/ArticleDisplay.php?Article=TrueStory911

Published on February 24, 2009 at 5:59 am  Comments (1)  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://jewise.wordpress.com/the-true-story-of-911/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

One CommentLeave a comment

  1. When you label something as shockingly as you did, you better make sure it’s the truth. All I read was speculation that was very well documented. Is it the truth, that’s your opinion. What I know is true is “Tired of Swatting Flies” is the key to this mystery. President Bush claimed, “He was tired of swatting flies” and we assumed he was talking about the Radical Muslim threats. If my memory serves me, President Bush wasn’t dealing with a Radical Muslim element in his first 9 months. Bush’s pests were all domestic. He had just been selected. He changed the age old defense policy of “Mutually Assured Destruction” for a “Missile Shield” without debate. He had a Senator switch “Teams” and stop his radical right agenda. He rushed to silence Tim McVeigh and then he went on vacation. China sent a plane back to us by FED EX and Henan just admitted to having an AIDS epidemic. Bin Laden was no where in the picture. Campaign finance reform passed after so many attempts, but few asked why. What happened? President Bush was tired of swatting flies. Domestic flies. He knew of the threat well in advance and went on vacation. The first day back he had nothing better to do than read? America only saw the attack and felt the hurt. We’ve been misled ever since. The truth has not been told. It has been rewritten several times.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: